hugging-science▌
K-Dense Inc./hugging-science · updated May 19, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
A curated index of scientific datasets, models, and demos for AI/ML research in various scientific domains.
| name | hugging-science |
| description | Use when the user is doing AI/ML work in a scientific domain — biology, chemistry, physics, astronomy, climate, genomics, materials science, medicine, ecology, energy, conservation, engineering, mathematics, scientific reasoning, drug discovery, protein design, weather modeling, theorem proving, single-cell, PDE solving, or anything similar. Hugging Science (huggingscience.co) is a curated catalog of scientific datasets, models, blog posts, and interactive Spaces; the `hugging-science` org on Hugging Face hosts community datasets, models, and demo Spaces. This skill helps you discover the right resource AND actually use it — loading datasets via `datasets`, running models via `transformers` or the HF Inference API, calling Spaces like BoltzGen via `gradio_client`, and citing blog posts for methodology. Trigger this skill whenever a user mentions a scientific ML task, asks for "a dataset/model for X" where X is a scientific topic, wants to fine-tune on scientific data, asks about protein / molecule / genome / climate / materials / astronomy / pathology / weather ML, or needs AI tools for research — even if they never say "Hugging Science" explicitly. The catalog is purpose-built for LLM agents (it ships an `llms-full.txt`); prefer it over generic web search for these tasks. |
| metadata | skill-author: K-Dense Inc. |
Hugging Science
Hugging Science is a curated, LLM-friendly index of scientific datasets, models, blog posts, and interactive demos for ML researchers. Use it when a scientific ML question lands in front of you — it's much higher signal than generic search and the entries are pre-filtered for quality and openness.
There are two related surfaces, and you should use both:
- The catalog at
huggingscience.co— a static, parseable index of resources across 17 scientific domains. It exposesllms.txt(compact),llms-full.txt(full content), andtopics/<slug>.md(per-domain). These are markdown files designed to be fetched and read. - The
hugging-scienceHugging Face organization —huggingface.co/hugging-science— community-submitted datasets, a few models, and ~27 interactive Spaces (notably BoltzGen for protein/binder design, Dataset Quest for submissions, and Science Release Heatmap for ecosystem visualization).
The catalog points to resources hosted on the broader Hugging Face Hub. So an entry like arcinstitute/opengenome2 is a regular HF dataset that you load with the datasets library; an entry like facebook/esm2_t33_650M_UR50D is a regular HF model you load with transformers. The catalog's job is curation and discovery; usage goes through standard Hugging Face APIs.
When to use this skill
Engage this skill when the user's task involves AI/ML applied to science. Common signals:
- Names a scientific domain (protein, genome, molecule, crystal, weather, climate, galaxy, EEG, microbiome, pathology, plasma, …)
- Asks "is there a dataset/model for X" where X is scientific
- Wants to fine-tune on scientific data, evaluate on scientific benchmarks, or reproduce a scientific ML paper
- Asks about specific known scientific models (Evo-2, ESM2, BoltzGen, Nucleotide Transformer, AlphaFold-derived, etc.)
- Needs an interactive demo for a scientific task (binder design, theorem proving, etc.)
If the task is generic ML (recommendation systems, chatbot RAG, vision on cats and dogs), this skill is not the right tool — defer to general HF Hub knowledge instead.
Core workflow
Most invocations follow this five-step loop. Don't skip discovery — the value of Hugging Science is that it has already filtered hundreds of resources down to high-signal picks per domain.
1. Identify the domain(s)
Map the user's task to one or more of the 17 topic slugs:
astronomy · benchmark · biology · biotechnology · chemistry · climate · conservation · earth-science · ecology · energy · engineering · genomics · materials-science · mathematics · medicine · physics · scientific-reasoning
Some tasks span multiple topics (e.g., drug discovery → chemistry + biology + medicine). Fetch each relevant topic.
2. Fetch the relevant catalog content
Use the bundled script for clean, structured access:
python scripts/fetch_catalog.py topic biology
python scripts/fetch_catalog.py topic materials-science --filter models
python scripts/fetch_catalog.py search "protein language model"
python scripts/fetch_catalog.py all # full llms-full.txt
You can also fetch the raw markdown directly:
https://huggingscience.co/llms.txt— compact indexhttps://huggingscience.co/llms-full.txt— every entry, every domainhttps://huggingscience.co/topics/<slug>.md— one domain (slug is hyphenated, e.g.materials-science.md,earth-science.md,scientific-reasoning.md)
Each entry is a markdown block with Type, Tags, HuggingFace URL (or Link for blogs), and a one-line description. See references/topics-and-slugs.md for the entry schema and slug list.
3. Pick the right resource(s)
Read the descriptions and tags. Match to the user's task with judgment, not keyword overlap. Things to weigh:
- Scale fit — Evo-2 40B is overkill for a quick sequence classification on a laptop; ESM2 35M might be perfect.
- License and access — most are open, but check the underlying HF model card.
- Modality alignment — DNA vs. protein vs. SMILES vs. crystal structure; many "biology" models are not interchangeable.
- Recency / supersession — if both an older and newer entry cover the same task, prefer newer unless there's a reason not to.
If you're not sure which resource to pick, briefly present the top 2–3 candidates to the user with their tradeoffs, then proceed once they choose. Don't pick silently when the choice materially changes the work.
For domain-specific go-to picks (the "if in doubt, start here" entries), see references/flagship-resources.md.
4. Use the resource
The mechanics depend on resource type. Read the matching reference file before writing code:
- Datasets →
references/using-datasets.md— loading viadatasets, streaming for huge corpora, common columns, splits - Models →
references/using-models.md— localtransformers, Hugging Face Inference API, Inference Providers for very large models, GPU sizing - Spaces (interactive demos) →
references/using-spaces.md—gradio_clientpattern with a worked BoltzGen example
The reference files are short and focused. If you're already fluent in the relevant API, skim; if not, read fully before writing code. The patterns are different from generic HF usage in a few important places (e.g., trust_remote_code requirements, scientific-data dtype gotchas).
5. Cite the methodology
When the catalog has a blog post matching the task (Type: blog or in the Blog Posts section of a topic file), include its URL when you explain your approach to the user. Methodology blogs are written by the dataset/model authors and answer "why this design" questions that model cards usually skip. Treat them like citations — a one-line "see <link> for the methodology behind X" is plenty.
Authentication: HF_TOKEN
Many catalog resources are gated (clinical data, large foundation models, private Spaces). Authenticate via the HF_TOKEN environment variable.
Load HF_TOKEN from a .env file when available — that's where the user keeps secrets. Use python-dotenv at the top of any script that hits the HF API:
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv() # picks up HF_TOKEN from .env in cwd or any parent dir
If .env doesn't exist or doesn't define HF_TOKEN, fall back gracefully — many resources are public and work without it. Don't hard-code tokens, don't echo them, and don't suggest huggingface-cli login as the primary path; the user prefers .env.
The .env file should contain a line like:
HF_TOKEN=hf_...
If you're creating a new project, also add .env to .gitignore if it isn't already there.
A few important things to remember
The catalog is curated, not exhaustive. If a user needs a specific resource and Hugging Science doesn't list it, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist on HF Hub. Search HF Hub directly as a fallback. But always start with the catalog when the domain matches — the curation is the value.
The entries are pointers. Don't try to "use Hugging Science" as if it were an API. There is no Hugging Science inference endpoint. Every actionable resource lives on HF Hub or as a HF Space, and you use it via the standard HF tooling.
Many scientific models require trust_remote_code=True. Custom architectures (Evo-2, many genomics/materials models) ship custom modeling code. This is normal in this ecosystem. Pass the flag and inform the user.
Scientific datasets are often large and weirdly-shaped. Genomics corpora can be billions of tokens; cosmology images can be hundreds of GB; materials datasets contain non-standard objects (crystal structures, graphs). Use streaming (streaming=True on load_dataset) by default for anything claimed to be over a few GB, and inspect schema before assuming columns.
Spaces are great for one-off scientific generations. If the user wants to design a binder for a target protein or run inference on a hosted model demo, calling the Space via gradio_client is faster and cheaper than spinning up the model locally. Check references/using-spaces.md first — huggingface.co/hugging-science has ~27 of these.
The catalog itself may evolve. Entries get added regularly; occasionally entries change slugs. If a URL 404s, refetch the topic file or llms.txt to get the current state — don't paper over the failure.
Bundled resources
scripts/fetch_catalog.py— fetch and filter catalog content. Run with--helpfor full usage. Use this in preference to ad-hoc WebFetch calls when you need structured access.references/topics-and-slugs.md— exact topic slugs, what each covers, and the entry schema.references/using-datasets.md— patterns and gotchas for loading scientific datasets.references/using-models.md— running scientific models locally, via Inference API, or via Inference Providers.references/using-spaces.md— calling HF Spaces (notably BoltzGen) programmatically withgradio_client.references/flagship-resources.md— go-to dataset/model picks per domain when the user wants a sensible default.
How to use hugging-science on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add hugging-science
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches hugging-science from GitHub repository K-Dense Inc./hugging-science and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate hugging-science. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /hugging-science) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★51 reviews- ★★★★★Li Flores· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: hugging-science is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Naina Torres· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for hugging-science matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Olivia Johnson· Dec 8, 2024
I recommend hugging-science for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Naina Flores· Nov 27, 2024
hugging-science reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Aisha Srinivasan· Nov 11, 2024
We added hugging-science from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Min Johnson· Nov 7, 2024
Useful defaults in hugging-science — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Wang· Nov 3, 2024
hugging-science is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Neel Mehta· Oct 26, 2024
I recommend hugging-science for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Isabella Gupta· Oct 22, 2024
Keeps context tight: hugging-science is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Min Smith· Oct 18, 2024
Registry listing for hugging-science matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 51